MMA For Real: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

The Case For Interim Titles

Many fans have been complaining about Interim titles and how them mean "nothing". I don't understand the dislike for interim titles. UFC 114 Rampage vs. Evans is the highest grossing PPV that didn't have a title on the line. What if the interim title was on the line? Would more people buy it? If not, who cares? You are telling me you would not like to see two more rounds of that fight? Even if you think the interim title is a fake title, it still gives the elite fighters a chance to go five rounds. An opportunity all elite fighters should have at this point. I was very surprised when I came across this article from Ben Fowlkes:

As if fans haven't had enough of "fake" titles lately. As if any fight becomes instantly more important as soon as there's some chunk of hardware at stake. The latest MMA figure to ask for an interim title fight is manager Ed Soares, who suggested this week that while Rua heals up from knee surgery, Lyoto Machida should fight Rashad Evans for the interim belt, with the winner to take on Rua once he's ready to return to action...

But finally, and most importantly, interim titles hold no actual value. A championship belt is like one of those antique armoires you see on PBS: it's only as valuable as other people think it is, and that value is inextricably tied to how rare it is... Let's just forget about interim titles altogether for a while. They are the participant ribbons of MMA. They mean nothing, and they're a little condescending. If a champ's going to be unavailable for an unreasonable amount of time – and no, less than a year is not unreasonable – and the organization feels it needs to move on without him for the time being, fine. Strip him of the title and put it up for grabs.

 

In this day and age when elite fighters don't go five rounds I think anytime the opportunity is there the UFC should do it. Fowlkes says interim titles holds no value, in MMA we like clarity. We want to know the best fighters are fighting equally great competition. With interim titles you get a clear #1 contender. Now would I want to see Lyoto vs. Evans right now, no. I would however like to see Antonio Rogerio Nogueira fight Evans for the interim title. Is anybody against this? With interim titles you can possibly avoid the Leties vs. Silva title fights of the world. I want to see Machida vs. Jackson go five rounds. We are already robbed of potential great five round fights, is it so bad that we ask for more elite fighters getting the chance to go five rounds? 

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm with you dude

I have no problem with Interim titles. Everyone knows they’re not the real title, that’s why they’ve got the “interim” in front of them.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Jul 29, 2010 3:13 PM EDT reply actions  

statistically

the naked truth is that people like them in fact :)

yo EVeezy, the 5 round argument is a winner too, good stuff

"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum." ~ Roddy Piper

by RearNakedPoke on Jul 29, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where in the rule book does it say fighters can’t agree to a five round fight? You don’t need to strap silly "interim’ titles on a fight. This is not the WWE. If you want MMA to be taken seriously as a sport we need to stop making up titles. If the fighters want to fight for 5 rounds, just contract it for that and keep the interim title stuffed in the closet.

by aggieheaven on Jul 29, 2010 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed, but it’s a functional “excuse” to see 5 round fights go down. Which I’m all for.

"I don't care, hit him with your groin!"

by 3PA on Jul 29, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

The fights can be contracted for five rounds

But Zuffa has chosen to only make title fights that long.

You know what's really fun? Not being a raving lunatic. Give it a try some time, you might just like it!

Live previews and reviews of all major fights! LightsOutRadio.com

by -Neil- on Jul 29, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only in Nevada, actually.

Check out my MMA highlight videos!
http://www.dailymotion.com/WheelchairBandit

by Brian Mayes on Jul 30, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would prefer to see the UFC adopt a 5 round main event policy reguardless of weather or not its a title fight.

I don’t think every fight needs to be 5 rounds but the line needs to drawn somewhere so why not 5 rounds for main events and title fights?

I like the feeling of hunting down what I feed my family. If there’s a beast out there capable of hunting down Brock Lesnar, he would do it and make me the trophy on his den wall. But the laws of nature dictate that I’m going to be the one who goes into the wild and comes home with the evening’s bounty. - The #1 ranked HW in the world...

by DrewMoney$$$ on Jul 29, 2010 5:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Elite fighters should fight five rounds, period.

But having it be for an “interim” title is just confusing for the average viewer. It dilutes the value of the undisputed title. The casual fan doesn’t really know who’s the “real” champ and who’s not.

Just let these guys fight five rounds and be done with it. If bums on the local level can fight five rounds because a title is on the line, there’s no reason why elite level guys can’t do the same thing when there isn’t a title on the line. No point in bringing a meaningless “interim” title into it. You start doing it too much, and this turns into boxing, where everyone and their brother has some sort of belt.

Check out my MMA highlight videos!
http://www.dailymotion.com/WheelchairBandit

by Brian Mayes on Jul 29, 2010 5:33 PM EDT reply actions  

If bums on the local level can fight five rounds because a title is on the line, there’s no reason why elite level guys can’t do the same thing when there isn’t a title on the line.

That’s fair enough but there’s something special about title fights being the only fights to have 5 rounds, i’d be sad to see it otherwise, much and all as it would be cool….the novelty of a title fight is more appealing to me, no way i wanted 2 more rounds of Ortiz v Griffin II [LMFAO]

"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum." ~ Roddy Piper

by RearNakedPoke on Jul 29, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"Those Who Follow The Crowd Usually Get Lost In It"
Start posting on MMA For Real »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

BOSTON - AUGUST 28:  Joe Lauzon celebrates after defeating Gabe Ruediger in the first round of their UFC lightweight bout at the TD Garden on August 28 2010 in Boston Massachusetts.  (Photo by Josh Hedges/Zuffa LLC/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images) link

MMA Mania Confirms Joe Lauzon v. George Sotiropoulos At UFC 123

Photo

Shine Fights September 10 Event Continues To Hit Roadblocks

Photo

The Fight Fix Talks With UFC President Dana White

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Mma-lg_small Kelvin Hunt

Example-spartanhead_small Matt Bishop

Editors

Small Charles Walker

Contributors

Jose-aldo_small Rich Wyatt

Picture_001_small Erich Vowell

Atlanta_braves_small Anthony Pace