Fight Rewind: Bisping's comment embarrassing, shows sport has long way to go
As MMA continues to grow, every little negative can be labeled as "bad for the sport." Although I hate terming every slip-up as such, Michael Bisping's comments during the UFC 114 post-fight press conference fit snuggly under the "bad for the sport" banner.
Answering a question about a cutman accidentally putting Vaseline in his eye, Bisping responded that he didn't want to "look like a faggot" and not fight. What's worse is that many attending the press conference could be heard laughing following the comment and during a quasi-apology by UFC president Dana White, who, like Bisping, laughed the whole thing off.
The comment was turned into one big laughing matter, with no one seemingly grasping the true gravity of Bisping's remark. Here is the conversation:
BISPING: He put the Vasoline on and got a real good (bit) of it in my eye there and I was standing there and there's thousands of people and millions at home on TV and I'm like, 'I don't want to look like a faggot like I don't want to get in there...'"
WHITE: He didn't mean that, he didn't mean that word. Learn from my mistakes.
BISPING: You know what I'm saying.
WHITE: They don't, trust me.
The whole thing seemed to be a source of comedy to many there. The fact things like this are tolerated and supported by many people is a complete and utter embarrassment to the sport.
What's worse is that this isn't White's first rodeo with this particular remark.White made mention to Bisping to "learn from my mistakes," referring to the fact that he himself was in hot water last year for using the same term. He apologized to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD) and to the public on a video blog, saying "the last thing I would ever want anyone to think about me or think is cool is to go out and attack somebody because of their sexual orientation."
Today, that apology rings hollow.
For Bisping to use that term mere days after calling out a Sherdog.com reporter for criticizing his fighting skills shows a great disconnect. Fighting is Bisping's identity and he was not pleased with the criticism, opening his workout with "F--- Sherdog.com." For him to blast someone else's identity days after being so gravely offended shows just how wide that disconnect really is, both in language and perception.
To me, things like this is what sets MMA far behind other sports. If someone did drop a homophobic slur (or racial slur, or anything of that ilk), they would be torn apart not only by the media, but by the fans, as well. Groups like GLADD would be calling them for an apology - one they would quickly get - and the league office would be investigating.
An issue such as this is taken so seriously in other sports that running back Larry Johnson, formerly of the National Football League's Kansas City Chiefs, was first suspended and then cut from the team in October after calling one of his Twitter followers a "fag" and then repeating the same slur in the locker room the following day. The team cut him in response to a series of indigents, the slur being one of the leading factors. The New York Times reported the Chiefs were "unimpressed" by Johnson's apology, which did not apologize to the gay community.
This came after WWE Chairman Vince McMahon got himself in trouble in August when his "Monday Night Raw" show was in Las Vegas. He called the masks some Cirque du Soleli performers were wearing "really gay" on live television. I cringed when I heard that. He later apologized.
The list goes on, and it surely will be added to in the future.
My point, however, is not that other sports don't do this. It's that they simply are not tolerated when they do happen. It's that actions like Bisping's are condoned and almost encouraged by many people in the room laughing (including people who should know better), the president almost jokingly apologizing for the comment and Bisping not being reprimanded or called out by anybody for the comment. In doing research for this, I typed in "michael bisping faggot" and "bisping faggot" into Google News search to see if this had been covered elsewhere. Zero results. Nothing. Zip. Zilch. A return for the more modest "bisping slur" yielded three results, none of which pertained to the issue at hand.
I'm not sure if I look at this differently because of my university background, but these days, hearing these comments make me sick. I remember walking into my college newspaper on my first day as a freshman and hearing that you simply do not use gay slurs in the professional world. At the time I was coming straight from high school where gay slurs just flowed like it was nothing. It always was that way. So this was quite the radical change. But you know what? I liked it. It wasn't a hurtful atmosphere anymore. It baffles me to this day that smart, educated people still turn to such words.
Because I had the opportunity to attend a university with more than 45,000 students, I gained a very diverse group of friends, including many gay friends. Terms like "faggot" or "homo" or any other type of slur hurt these men and women. I've seen it first hand and quite frankly, I'm embarrassed for humanity when I see it. When I see it pop up with zero consequences in a sport that I love, I'm sad.
You can say it's just words, but it's not. Words have meaning, they have connotations. It's the whole point of language. Imagine if Bisping said the N-word in that tone and sense on that dais. Would people be laughing? Absolotely not. And would the man sitting next to him, Quinton "Rampage" Jackson, be laughing? I would bet the farm he wouldn't be. And the outrage that should be present over this comment would be in full effect, even further.
Comments like Bisping's combined with the follow-up laughter and lack of a serious reprimand highlight a bigger problem: A high school mentality. For professional athletes, which is what mixed martial artists are pushed as, it's unacceptable. The fact that it seemingly is condoned and enjoyed shows that this sport still has a long way to go.
Matt Bishop is an MMAForReal.com reporter and pens "Fight Rewind" at least once each week. He can be reached at bishop20@gmail.com.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think you are making too much out of it. Bisping didn’t use the word to slander a specific person, he used it in a context that illustrates a popular perception. “Faggots” are generally viewed as weak, cowardly and over emotional by society as a whole, right or wrong that is simply a brute fact.
There is no question that the comment was poorly chosen but there is no need to be so sensitive when no harm was intended.
Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but you still can't
help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs...
I kinda agree with Villin
He could have chosen a better word….then again…I’m one of those people that HATE PC shit…and I ain’t talking about computers either…him saying this word doesn’t have anything to do with the sport having a long way to go…if anything…it’s fighters and people involved in the sport learning play the role as more and more media outlets start to cover this thing…that’s the shit that has a long way to go…
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
its no biggie really
he didnt want to look like a bundle of sticks, no harm done….i lol’ed anyway (",)
"Be yourself, don't take anyone's shit, and never let them take you alive." ~ George Way
I’d say that saying ‘faggot’ is not anything that fuels homophobic sentiments; it’s symptomatic of underlying homophobic sentiments on a larger scale.
I’d rather people say what’s on their mind – political correctness, as mentioned by Kelvin, only teaches people to disguise their racism/homophobia/bigotry.
And actually, look what we have now because bisping blurted that out: a discussion about homophobia (as it relates to MMA/combat sports)
"I don't care, hit him with your groin!"
I have to agree with Kelvin and Villin...
I don’t think Bisping was attacking homosexuals when he said that. He was referring to himself and his desire not to be a wimp. I wouldn’t overreact here. Comparing Bisping to Larry Johnson is not a level playing ground. Johnson was cut because he was getting fat, getting lazy, and turned 30 which in the NFL means times up. Johnson was cut more for his lack of prodcution on the field then his mouth off the field, although his mouth off the field sealed the deal. Bisping trains and fights hard but made a slightly off color comment…he is human…when he starts attacking gay people then we should be considered. But as long as the comment is talking about himself and his desire to man up, I give him a pass.
You're missing the point...
It doesn’t matter if Bisping was attacking a specific person or even a group of persons… using a word that describes a group of people as an insult is, in itself, an attack. jrr091784, you’re very wrong. He wasn’t expressing his desire not to be a wimp; if he was, he would’ve used the word wimp. Instead, he chose to use a word that has extremely painful associations for many gay folks.
Matt made a perfect point: would all of you be defending Bisping if he had been suggesting that he had to push through some laziness in training camp and said that he had to because he didn’t wan’t to be a lazy nigger? You can pretend all you want that it’s different, but it simply isn’t. Both words have an intense (and painful, to their victims) historical context and to use them at all is unacceptable. It’s not being PC, it’s simply not being a dick.
Generally speaking I don't really care what people say, because people are retarded
But Swix, as well as Matt make a very good point:
Matt made a perfect point: would all of you be defending Bisping if he had been suggesting that he had to push through some laziness in training camp and said that he had to because he didn’t wan’t to be a lazy nigger?
I’d bet dollars to donoughts that you’d have at least one or two folks are the press conference jumping the man, and that nobody would be laughing. Pretty funny how it’s funny to be dispariging to homosexuals (whether that’s what Bisping meant or not) but that if race is brought into it he’d probably have Al Sharpton calling for him to be fired in nano-seconds.
Live previews and reviews of all major fights!
LightsOutRadio.com
well
considering that laziness and the N word have no real relation….that would be pretty stupid….but you can’t deny that the word wimp and the F word are pretty closely related in context…..maybe he should have said fruitcake or something?
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
bunch of unordered thoughts on the issue
Way to sensitive, on this issue. Poor word choice sure. Intended insult or attack, not at all.
We do live in a free speech country. And by consequence people must learn to interpret intention behind peoples words. It is obvious by the context of it he meant he did not want to look like a wimp, baby, or b**ch. Saying I did not want to look like a Faggot has the same context meaning, and is more often said in non-scrutinized settings.
It comes down to do you want people to be open and free to talk, or do you want them to simply not say anything or censure them selves to oblivion for fear they may accidentally upset someone.
People need to learn to have thicker skin, and accept that not everyone is out to insult them or their friends.
Dana was correct when he said “They don’t, trust me.” saying the media would not know what he meant. The media and people looking to make points will grab one line take it out of context to vilify someone.
http://www.ShuffleGames.Net MindGames::AoC Check out my personal Blog or follow me on Twitter:: AceOfClubsSG
I'd like to present a counter arguement
Mr. Bishop, I understand what you’re saying and don’t take issue with the sentiment of the topic. However, I think society is at a place where we’ve become oversensitive to issues like these. There are many words that are used as slurs and “faggot” is just one of many. That doesn’t mean that we should wipe these words out of the dictionary for fear of hurting someone’s feelings. People call me dumbass all the time. Should I take offense when someone else uses that word in a derogatory manner?
A word is just that. A word. It’s, as you say, the connotation that matters. But why does it matter? Because someone might take offense to the word? Again, why does that matter? We have become so sensitive that we cannot just look at a moron and accept that they are a moron because of their hate speech. No, we have to raise flags, hold demonstrations and picket to protest because a moron said something foolish.
Instead, why can’t we, as society, point and laugh at the idiots that are racist, homophobic, sexist, etc.? Why get angry at fools that can’t control their tongue? Let them have their hate speech. Be above it all and let it go.
When small issues like these get blown out of proportion, it takes away from the issue itself and becomes more about the “movement”. And the more it becomes about the “movement” the less likely some people are willing to side with it. I’m not speaking for everone when I say this, but we’re tired of hearing about the “movements”. We get it already. There are idiots out there that spew venom, hate, and sometimes, just maybe, they’re resorting back to childish insults. Get over it and move on.
I mostly agree with this
With words, it is all about the context in which they are used. If I tell one of my firends to go to hell or F off, my demenor and the context would be diffrent if I was yelling at someone that just cut me off on the road. Bisping wasn’t calling the cornerman the “F word”. Honestly I don’t care if Bisping is Homophobic, and if he is where does that get us?
"I have to carry out another fine moment before I die."
-Tatsuya Kawajiri-
Good lord.
It’s crazy to ask professional athletes to be professional and not say stupid shit? Go to work and call your co-worker a faggot in front of your boss (even better, at a board meeting) and see what happens.
A word is just that. A word. It’s, as you say, the connotation that matters. But why does it matter? Because someone might take offense to the word? Again, why does that matter? We have become so sensitive that we cannot just look at a moron and accept that they are a moron because of their hate speech. No, we have to raise flags, hold demonstrations and picket to protest because a moron said something foolish.
Yea..in my younger days….certain words would trigger my anger…but now…I pretty much just laugh…
I mean..it’s like Patrick Swayze said in the movie “Roadhouse”….when dude was like….“what if somebody calls my momma a whore?” Swayze was like….“Is she?”
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
oh you silly people.
HES BRITISH. faggot means a different thing there, which is why when he said “they know what i mean” dana said “no, they don’t” because a lot of people wont get that hes saying something different.
faggot can mean a cigarette (the most known over here)
but it also means a meat-heat/meatball (someone who has no drive)
its like calling football players soccerplayers. you do that in the US nobody cares. you call someone a soccer player in the UK and you might get stabbed.
Over here in the UK faggot has a completely different and less serious meaning to what it has over in the states.
Why people are blowing up over this small hick up is beyond me.
"Being challenged in life is inevitable, being defeated is optional."

by 




















