Matt Hughes Must Not Like Chuck Liddell Very Much

Michael David Smith spoke with Matt Hughes earlier this week about Chuck Liddell potentially retiring. Hughes thinks that Liddell shouldn't retire and below is his take on it:
"Chuck is still dangerous to anybody. Anybody that thinks that if Chuck Liddell hits them they won't go down is wrong. Chuck is a threat to anybody. As a friend I hope he doesn't leave the sport for two reasons: Number one, I like him and I like watching him. Number two, I still think he's good enough to do some serious damage to people."
Umm...newsflash. Most people like watching Chuck Liddell fight, but that's not a good enough reason for him to keep going out there at this point in his career. Also, it's funny that Hughes mentions he likes watching Liddell fight. He must have missed his last 3 or 4 fights, because his analysis of Liddell's skills is WAY off for a couple of reasons:
- Liddell hasn't finished anyone since Tito Ortiz at UFC 66. Which just happens to be 2 1/2 years ago.
- Liddell hit Keith Jardine for three rounds, and Jardine was still standing at the end of the fight. Hell, he won the fight(it shouldn't have been a split decision either). Liddell hit Wanderlei Silva with everything he had, and still couldn't finish him. Liddell hit Rashad Evans a couple of times, and Rashad shrugged it off like it was nothing. Liddell hit Shogun last weekend a couple of times, and didn't go down. Liddell isn't going to submit anyone, so I don't see how he's such a threat being that his once sturdy chin has turned into playdough nowadays.
Maybe there's some truth to the question I posed in October 2008, asking if Liddell has lost that KO power? It's natural to want your favorite athletes to go out on top. However, what's more important is that we should be able to realize when those same athletes just can't perform like they used to. There are so many examples out there for Liddell to learn from in terms of hanging on too long. Let's hope he doesn't have a group of "yes men" in his ear telling him to go for it one more time. His time has come.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
I think he has lost some power, a lot of speed and reflexes, and he is now facing a bunch of fighters who can actually strike well. He can’t compete with any of the top LHW’s in the UFC anymore since they can strike better than Jeremy Horn. Jardine shook him a bit, Rampage took a lot more of his confidence and then Rashad took the rest. I think the Rashad KO was worse because this guy was a wrestler on The Ultimate Fighter, not a really tough veteran from Pride who previously proved he could whoop Chuck’s ass.
Being beat by these ‘little kids’ has to hurt his ego.
I think he should get one more fight, a fight to go out on top. Put him in the cage with Mark Coleman and then after the fight they can both call it a career. Liddell will go out on top, of course.
by joseph. on Apr 25, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Coleman will probably not get santioned to fight again after this Stephan Bonnar fight. Hell, he had to before the commission just to get approved for this fight. I don’t want to risk seeing Liddell get KTFO again, nor do I want to see him have a ‘gimmie’ fight just to go out with a win either.
http://www.mmaforreal.com
by Kelvin Hunt on Apr 25, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that Liddell still has it in him to beat a LOT of guys, but there are too many people that present problems for him in the here and now. His chin isn’t what it used to be, it seems, but I don’t think that he’s lost all of his power. Sure, he hit Silva a few times, but I don’t seem to remember him really catching him. As for Jardine.. well, Jardine is a funny guy like that. One minute he’ll go down easy, the next he’ll take a five rounder with Jackson.
Live previews and reviews of all major fights!
LightsOutRadio.com
by -Neil- on Apr 25, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dawg…Liddell caught Wandy a couple of times…with stiff ass 1-2’s…and Wandy didn’t go down….much less out.
http://www.mmaforreal.com
by Kelvin Hunt on Apr 25, 2009 2:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















