Does Chuck Liddell Deserve A Title Shot?

That is...if he gets past Rashad Evans at UFC 88. First of all let me say this, I think Rampage Jackson deserves an immediate re-match...but given his legal problems I can see why that option is no longer viable. So let's take a look at Liddell since his KO loss to Rampage Jackson
Liddell has gone 1-1 since his KO loss to Rampage at UFC 71 of last year. A split decision loss(that should have been unanimous) to Keith Jardine, and a unanimous decision win over a top ten opponent in Wanderlei Silva. Liddell has gone on record here stating that he believes he should get a title shot if he beats Rashad Evans. He has even made an argument why Lyoto Machida doesn't deserve a title shot here.
Do you think Liddell earns a title shot if he beats Evans? Does Liddell have to finish Rashad Evans to earn a title shot? If you don't think Liddell has earned a title shot...list who and why you think they deserve one.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Firstly, I think Liddel will lose to Rashad so we won’t be needing this debate.
I’d much rather watch Chuck in action over Lyoto. There is a difference between “winning” and “NOT losing” and I’m afraid Machida’s fights represent the latter. I honestly get pretty bored watching Lyoto fight but hey… having said that, he still deserves a title shot before Chuck does.
by Flyingknees on Aug 22, 2008 7:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed 100% with what was just said^…
I cant see chuck beating Evans … I know chucks a banger and evans aint like taking hits… but i think he’ll win…
by mike on Aug 22, 2008 9:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think if he puts Evans away impressively, he could put his name in the hat of contenders…because really, other than Machida, the only other option to fight Forrest is Rampage and his legal stuff might take a while, so I could understand that logic, but I really don’t want to see Chuck with the belt again and I think he’d beat Forrest easily
by Charles Walker on Aug 22, 2008 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In my opinion there are two possible ways to determine who gets the next title shot: either the winner of the Machida/Silva match gets the next title shot, or perhaps Chuck, if he does in fact win against Evans (which I personaly think he will), should fight the winner of that match to see who gets a title shot, being that Machida or Silva, although both are 13-0, haven’t beaten anyone that is in true title contention in the UFC. But by the way the two matches have been set date wise, it does seem to appear the UFC is banking on Chuck to win in order to give him time to train for a match up with Griffin for the big New Years Eve show. There is no way that either Machida or Silva would be able to take a fight in December after fighting in October.
by El_Felix on Aug 22, 2008 10:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow some folks actually giving Rashad a shot at winning?(I don’t think Chuck will walk thru him at all).
by Kelvin on Aug 22, 2008 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, I disagree with some of you, because I honestly don’t think Rashad will beat Chuck. And I DON’T LIKE Chuck’s punk ass. I just don’t see Rashad having tons of success taking Chuck down, and I don’t see him getting in the line of fire too much to throw blow with Lidell. A surprise high kick is not going to beat Chuck.
With that being said, I still think Machida should be granted a title shot first (since Rampage can’t get an immediate rematch due to legal wrangling). True, his style isn’t the most exciting, but I think he might be the ‘next in line’ at this point.
by Jamar NuBar on Aug 26, 2008 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like Machida but he needs to face stiffer competition…the only top 10 LHW he’s faced is Sokoudjou…granted he did submit him…he needs to beat someone like Wanderlei Silva…someone at least top 5 before a title shot IMO.
by Kelvin on Aug 26, 2008 1:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














